Portugal's Housing Market Reaches Critical Imbalance of Wages and Prices
Portugal's economy has become a case study in contrasts, presenting itself as an attractive destination to live while being a difficult place to work, and a prime location for asset investment but challenging for value production. In recent years, the country has emerged as a paradigm within the OECD, marked by significant growth in tourism and real estate, yet where the real income from labor has not kept pace with the appreciation of assets. This growing disparity is central to understanding the current state of the Portuguese property market.
A striking graphic circulating on social media platform X highlights the severity of the affordability issue, comparing the number of net salary months required to purchase a 100-square-meter home. The data reveals that a Portuguese citizen needs 331 months, or nearly 28 years, for an asset that an American can acquire in 75 months, a Dane in 146, and a Briton in 189. This positions Portugal as the fourth most expensive country in this ranking, surpassed only by Russia and the microstates of Singapore and Hong Kong. This situation is not merely the result of an unprecedented surge in housing prices but stems from a fiscal and productive structure that heavily penalizes labor income and discourages productive investment.
The tax burden on labor in Portugal remains one of the highest in the OECD. In 2024, the tax wedge—the difference between the total labor cost to an employer and the employee's net salary—stood at 41.4%, compared to the OECD average of 34.8%. Meanwhile, the average income tax rate for salaries above the national average exceeds 37%, and corporate social security contributions are approximately 23.75%. In contrast, effective taxation on corporate profits is around 27.5%, higher than the OECD average and significantly above investment-friendly nations like Ireland (12.5%) and the Netherlands (19%). This imbalance reflects an economic model that favors rent-seeking over productive enterprise, channeling savings into assets like real estate rather than innovation or high-value exports. For more in-depth data, investors should consult our market insights page.
Over the last seven years, the Portuguese real estate market has appreciated by approximately 80%, double the OECD average. During the same period, the average net salary rose by only 23%. This has led to a severe erosion of housing accessibility, with the average debt-service-to-income ratio for home purchases now exceeding 60% of disposable income—a European record. A structural explanation lies in the insufficient supply of new housing. Between 2017 and 2023, Portugal constructed an average of only 2.1 new homes per thousand inhabitants annually, far below the OECD average of 5.5. This deficit is compounded by institutional bottlenecks, including slow municipal licensing processes, rigid urban planning, a scarcity of developed land, and a high tax load on the construction sector.
Need Expert Guidance?
Get personalized insights from verified real estate professionals, lawyers, architects, and more.
The effect of migration has further intensified demand. Since 2016, the number of foreign residents in Portugal has increased by 180%, compared to an OECD average of 40%. While domestic housing policy struggled to provide for residents, the state simultaneously encouraged external demand through unregulated migration policies and incentive programs for non-resident property buyers. This surge in prices could have been sustainable had it been matched by growth in productivity and housing supply. However, with labor productivity remaining 40% below the OECD average and non-housing private investment at a low 17% of GDP, the economy has prioritized asset value appreciation over productive activities, leading to a growth cycle that is apparent but structurally fragile.
A deep reconfiguration of Portugal's economic model is required to address this asymmetry. Key reforms should include a significant reduction in the tax burden on labor to align with the OECD average and a simplification of taxes on productive investment. Critically, a fiscal distinction must be made between investment in new construction and speculative investment. The current system treats developers who build new housing and investors who hold vacant land for capital gains identically. This fiscal neutrality is economically perverse, as it rewards unproductive capital for the scarcity it helps create. An intelligent reform would differentiate tax treatment, offering incentives for productive investment—such as new construction, rehabilitation, or affordable rentals—while imposing progressive penalties on the holding of idle urban land. Such a shift would align Portugal with OECD best practices, fostering a productive and regenerative model over the current extractive one. Understanding these investment risks is crucial for anyone entering the market.
Until such political courage is found, Portugal will remain defined by its core contradiction: an appealing destination to live but a difficult one to work, excellent for asset investment but unrewarding for value creation. In the long term, no economy can sustain itself on such an imbalance. For guidance on navigating this complex landscape, consulting with English-speaking accountants is a prudent step for any serious investor. Stay informed on Lisbon property market developments at realestate-lisbon.com.